From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 922DB7CA0 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:17:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58902304062 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nJuSHFcOyEFKIQVL for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:17:53 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: PAGE_CACHE_* removal in 4.6-rc3 Message-ID: <20160412211753.GL567@dastard> References: <20160412183105.GA10567@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160412183105.GA10567@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:31:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Dave, > > upstream removed the PAGE_CACHE_* macros in 4.6-rc3, which will cause > all kinds of interesting conflicts for FS work. Maybe it's a good idea > to rebase for-next ontop of -rc3 so that we can sort this out early? Yeah, I was thinking of doing that when I saw that this was merged. I've got a bit of stuff to sort out today, but I'll see what I can do about moving the master branch forward and rebasing the for-next branch on top of it. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs