From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] xfs: mark reclaimed inodes invalid earlier
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 16:49:00 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160413064900.GP567@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460525492-1170-8-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 03:31:28PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
>
> The last thing we do before using call_rcu() on an xfs_inode to be
> freed is mark it as invalid. This means there is a window between
> when we know for certain that the inode is going to be freed and
> when we do actually mark it as "freed".
>
> This is important in the context of RCU lookups - we can look up the
> inode, find that it is valid, and then use it as such not realising
> that it is in the final stages of being freed.
>
> As such, mark the inode as being invalid the moment we know it is
> going to be reclaimed. This can be done while we still hold the
> XFS_ILOCK_EXCL and the flush lock in xfs_inode_reclaim, meaning that
> it occurs well before we remove it from the radix tree, and that
> the i_flags_lock, the XFS_ILOCK and the inode flush lock all act as
> synchronisation points for detecting that an inode is about to go
> away.
>
> For defensive purposes, this allows us to add a further check to
> xfs_iflush_cluster to ensure we skip inodes that are being freed
> after we grab the XFS_ILOCK_SHARED and the flush lock - we know that
> if the inode number if valid while we have these locks held we know
> that it has not progressed through reclaim to the point where it is
> clean and is about to be freed.
>
> [bfoster: fixed __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim() using ip->i_ino after it
> had already been zeroed.]
And, of course, in reordering this I dropped this fix because it was
handled by the reworking of tagging code to use pag->pag_agno.
So I've brought that small change forward to this patch (using
pag->pag_agno instead of deriving it from the ip->i_ino in
__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim()).
That means I have to rebase the later cleanup patch too, but the end
result of the patch set is identical...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-13 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-13 5:31 [PATCH 00/11 v3] xfs: inode reclaim vs the world Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: we don't need no steekin ->evict_inode Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13 21:20 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10 ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster fails to abort on error Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: fix inode validity check in xfs_iflush_cluster Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: skip stale inodes " Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: optimise xfs_iext_destroy Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: mark reclaimed inodes invalid earlier Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 6:49 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-04-14 12:10 ` Brian Foster
2016-04-14 23:31 ` Dave Chinner
2016-04-15 12:46 ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster has range issues Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: rename variables in xfs_iflush_cluster for clarity Dave Chinner
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: simplify inode reclaim tagging interfaces Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:10 ` Brian Foster
2016-06-29 4:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-04-13 5:31 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: move reclaim tagging functions Dave Chinner
2016-04-14 12:11 ` Brian Foster
2016-04-13 15:38 ` [PATCH 00/11 v3] xfs: inode reclaim vs the world Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160413064900.GP567@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox