From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B2C7CA1 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 06:52:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3A9AC001 for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 04:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id HbIPYLRPErVYT3XU (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 May 2016 04:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 04:52:04 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_quota: check report_mount return value Message-ID: <20160512115204.GC32528@infradead.org> References: <1e8b9ace-2fa3-bc11-4487-19be60053ef9@sandeen.net> <20160512031500.GD17859@dhcp12-143.nay.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160512031500.GD17859@dhcp12-143.nay.redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Zorro Lang Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 11:15:00AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > Thanks for fix my mistake. I can add TERSE report functional > test into my xfs/106 patch(which you're reviewing). Then it > can find bugs likes this ASAP. Yes, please. Additional test coverage is always good. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs