From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055157CA1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 03:09:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0B0304051 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 01:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bTCQZS3sUKYiveUx (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 01:09:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 01:09:48 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount Message-ID: <20160526080948.GC20307@infradead.org> References: <146424222237.6278.4174636124436241002.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146424223512.6278.15231849939938178494.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146424223512.6278.15231849939938178494.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Shouldn't these tests also add a _require_test now? But we probably should just move them to /tmp instead? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs