* remounting with "errors=remount-ro" in fstab fails.
@ 2016-05-26 13:36 Jan Vales
2016-05-26 13:38 ` Jan Vales
2016-05-26 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Vales @ 2016-05-26 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]
Hi there,
I just updated to 4.6 kernel, and now i cannot remount / rw anymore.
root@... # mount / -o remount,rw
mount: / not mounted or bad option
root@... # dmesg
[...]
XFS (md2): unknown mount option [errors=remount-ro].
[...]
root@... # cat /etc/fstab
[...]
/dev/sda / xfs ro,noatime,logbufs=8,errors=remount-ro,inode64 0 1
[...]
Was that change intentional?
As in: shall i remove errors=... from fstab or is it a mistake?
cheers,
Jan Vales
--
I only read plaintext emails.
Someone @ irc://irc.fsinf.at:6667/tuwien
webIRC: https://frost.fsinf.at/iris/
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remounting with "errors=remount-ro" in fstab fails.
2016-05-26 13:36 remounting with "errors=remount-ro" in fstab fails Jan Vales
@ 2016-05-26 13:38 ` Jan Vales
2016-05-26 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Vales @ 2016-05-26 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 656 bytes --]
On 05/26/2016 03:36 PM, Jan Vales wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I just updated to 4.6 kernel, and now i cannot remount / rw anymore.
>
> root@... # mount / -o remount,rw
> mount: / not mounted or bad option
>
> root@... # dmesg
> [...]
> XFS (md2): unknown mount option [errors=remount-ro].
> [...]
>
> root@... # cat /etc/fstab
> [...]
> /dev/sda / xfs ro,noatime,logbufs=8,errors=remount-ro,inode64 0 1
> [...]
/dev/md2, my fail, I removed the uuid here for readability.
>
> Was that change intentional?
> As in: shall i remove errors=... from fstab or is it a mistake?
>
cheers,
Jan Vales
--
I only read plaintext emails.
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: remounting with "errors=remount-ro" in fstab fails.
2016-05-26 13:36 remounting with "errors=remount-ro" in fstab fails Jan Vales
2016-05-26 13:38 ` Jan Vales
@ 2016-05-26 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-26 13:43 ` Jan Vales
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2016-05-26 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Vales; +Cc: xfs
The option was never actually supported. We used to ignore unknown
options for remount only, I guess that's why it used to work for you.
So yes, you can safely remove the option.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-26 13:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-26 13:36 remounting with "errors=remount-ro" in fstab fails Jan Vales
2016-05-26 13:38 ` Jan Vales
2016-05-26 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-26 13:43 ` Jan Vales
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox