From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D777CA6 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:33:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597558F8040 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id OS0cqhubKAIJY1FC (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 05:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 05:33:13 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch update to 26f1fe8 Message-ID: <20160601123313.GA32705@infradead.org> References: <20160601083455.GK12670@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160601083455.GK12670@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 06:34:55PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > [a3916e5] xfs: fix broken multi-fsb buffer logging Isn't this something we should try to get into 4.7? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs