From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC81C7CA6 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:05:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FED78F8039 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:05:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id oNz6eRaVtpm3jdmx (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 07:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 07:05:22 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs Message-ID: <20160601140522.GA16228@infradead.org> References: <1464615294-9946-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com> <20160531155348.GA24840@redhat.com> <20160601134427.GA15888@infradead.org> <20160601135150.GA30759@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160601135150.GA30759@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Jens Axboe , Michal Hocko , Jan Kara , "Martin K. Petersen" , Steven Whitehouse , Ming Lei , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sagi Grimberg , NeilBrown , Christoph Hellwig , Joe Thornber , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Shaohua Li , Tejun Heo , Keith Busch , "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" , Kent Overstreet , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "open list:DRBD DRIVER" On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:51:51AM -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > So should I not push this type of fix to Linus now? I was going to send > the above commit and this one to him this week: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/device-mapper/linux-dm.git/commit/?h=dm-4.7&id=57b3001b240629ecc5266d28c845e23ca5f11719 > > Instead, should bcache be made to not do what it is doing? I think that's much preferably. Otherwise we'll get a constant trickles of patches like that whenever someone tries bcache on top of another stacking driver. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs