From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89167CA0 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 03:07:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A047304051 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 01:07:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id tM4A2buqJoW3rZRE (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 01:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D3CC0003FE for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 08:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (vpn-48-2.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.48.2]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u58873vt013585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 04:07:06 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:07:03 +0200 From: Carlos Maiolino Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: add an option to enable reflinks at mount time Message-ID: <20160608080703.GA8987@redhat.com> References: <1464877150-20457-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1464877150-20457-4-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160606112342.GB23695@redhat.com> <20160608070459.GC18458@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160608070459.GC18458@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:04:59AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Yes, the comment is wrong. Any reason you didn't include me in the > reply? Also it seems your reply-to also magically drops you > from the reply. Are you using a new mailer? :) No, no reason, I missed to CC you. Maybe my CTRL-L list-reply in mutt screwed up with the destination fields, I should come back to group replies, thanks for the heads up :) -- Carlos _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs