From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624757CA0 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:58:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FFC304051 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VCqdc3pojoWjmSH0 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2016 15:58:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:57:42 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: add an option to enable reflinks at mount time Message-ID: <20160609225742.GZ26977@dastard> References: <1464877150-20457-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1464877150-20457-4-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160606112342.GB23695@redhat.com> <20160608070459.GC18458@infradead.org> <20160608080703.GA8987@redhat.com> <20160608081007.GB8987@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160608081007.GB8987@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com, hch@infradead.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:10:07AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:07:03AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:04:59AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Yes, the comment is wrong. Any reason you didn't include me in the > > > reply? Also it seems your reply-to also magically drops you > > > from the reply. Are you using a new mailer? :) > > > > No, no reason, I missed to CC you. Maybe my CTRL-L list-reply in mutt screwed up > > with the destination fields, I should come back to group replies, thanks for the > > heads up :) > > Oh crap, I did it again, ok, no more list-reply for me If you are using mutt, then just use "g" for group reply. I've never used anything else - it just does the right thing. I didn't even know that "list-reply" was something that people used.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs