From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] xfs: implement online get/set fs label
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:19:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610121931.GB21568@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67255993-9730-2872-675f-ac5cb518a338@sandeen.net>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 11:41:07AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Wire up label ioctls for XFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> This is where the implementation questions come in;
> is using growlock an abomination? How can I make the
> primary super change immediately visible?
>
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> index dbca737..ab59213 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
> #include "xfs_trans.h"
> #include "xfs_pnfs.h"
> #include "xfs_acl.h"
> +#include "xfs_log.h"
> +#include "xfs_sb.h"
>
> #include <linux/capability.h>
> #include <linux/dcache.h>
> @@ -1603,6 +1605,62 @@ xfs_ioc_swapext(
> return error;
> }
>
> +static int
> +xfs_ioc_getlabel(
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> + char __user *label)
> +{
> + int error = 0;
> + struct xfs_sb *sbp = &mp->m_sb;
> +
> + if (!mutex_trylock(&mp->m_growlock))
> + return -EWOULDBLOCK;
> + if (copy_to_user(label, sbp->sb_fname, sizeof(sbp->sb_fname)))
> + error = -EFAULT;
> + mutex_unlock(&mp->m_growlock);
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +xfs_ioc_setlabel(
> + struct file *filp,
> + struct xfs_mount *mp,
> + char __user *newlabel)
> +{
> + int error;
> + struct xfs_sb *sbp = &mp->m_sb;
> + char sb_fname[12];
> +
> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(sb_fname, newlabel, sizeof(sb_fname)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + error = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + /* growfs & label both muck w/ the super directly... */
> + if (!mutex_trylock(&mp->m_growlock))
> + return -EWOULDBLOCK;
Why the trylock here? It seems like we can still block in other places
(e.g., mnt_want_write_file() above).
> + memset(sbp->sb_fname, 0, sizeof(sbp->sb_fname));
> + strncpy(sbp->sb_fname, sb_fname, sizeof(sbp->sb_fname));
> +
So m_growlock excludes grow and nothing else looks like it mucks with
sb_fname, but what about any other invocations of xfs_log_sb()? For
example, is there a risk here of somebody else logging the superblock
buffer based on a transiently zeroed mp->m_sb.sb_fname? (In fact,
xfs_log_sb() looks kind of racy to me, but maybe I'm missing something.)
Perhaps we need an xfs_trans_getsb() somewhere in here..?
Brian
> + error = xfs_sync_sb(mp, true);
> + if (error)
> + goto out;
> + /*
> + * Most kernelspace superblock updates only update sb 0.
> + * Userspace relabel has always updated all, though, so:
> + */
> + error = xfs_update_secondary_supers(mp, sbp->sb_agcount, 0);
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&mp->m_growlock);
> + mnt_drop_write_file(filp);
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Note: some of the ioctl's return positive numbers as a
> * byte count indicating success, such as readlink_by_handle.
> @@ -1630,6 +1688,10 @@ xfs_file_ioctl(
> switch (cmd) {
> case FITRIM:
> return xfs_ioc_trim(mp, arg);
> + case FS_IOC_GET_FSLABEL:
> + return xfs_ioc_getlabel(mp, arg);
> + case FS_IOC_SET_FSLABEL:
> + return xfs_ioc_setlabel(filp, mp, arg);
> case XFS_IOC_ALLOCSP:
> case XFS_IOC_FREESP:
> case XFS_IOC_RESVSP:
> --
> 1.7.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-10 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-09 16:36 [PATCH 0/4] xfs: online relabeling [RFC] Eric Sandeen
2016-06-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] fs: hoist [GS]ET_FSLABEL to vfs Eric Sandeen
2016-06-09 16:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: factor out secondary superblock updates Eric Sandeen
2016-06-09 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: implement online get/set fs label Eric Sandeen
2016-06-10 12:19 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2016-06-09 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfsprogs: add online relabel commands Eric Sandeen
2016-06-09 16:51 ` [PATCH 0/4] xfs: online relabeling [RFC] Eric Sandeen
2016-06-10 12:19 ` Brian Foster
2016-06-10 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-10 18:12 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160610121931.GB21568@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox