From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pcacjr@zytor.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: refactor xfs_reserve_blocks() to handle ENOSPC correctly
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:37:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614133721.GD32443@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B68205CB-0E29-4BB5-BB2A-C41CB2F1C32E@zytor.com>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:32:57AM -0300, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
>
>
> On June 14, 2016 9:58:59 AM GMT-03:00, Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> wrote:
...
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> >---
> >
> >This is something I had laying around from the thin block device
> >reservation stuff. That work introduced a more common
> >xfs_mod_fdblocks()
> >failure scenario that isn't as much of a problem with the current code,
> >but the current xfs_reserve_blocks() retry code is clearly broken and
> >so
> >should probably be fixed up.
> >
> >Brian
> >
> >fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 105
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> >index b4d7582..003d180 100644
> >--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
> >+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c
...
> >@@ -707,54 +709,67 @@ retry:
> > mp->m_resblks_avail -= lcounter;
> > }
> > mp->m_resblks = request;
> >- } else {
> >- __int64_t free;
> >+ if (fdblks_delta) {
> >+ spin_unlock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
> >+ error = xfs_mod_fdblocks(mp, fdblks_delta, 0);
> >+ spin_lock(&mp->m_sb_lock);
> >+ }
> >+
> >+ goto out;
> >+ }
> >
> >+ /*
> >+ * If the request is larger than the current reservation, reserve the
> >+ * blocks before we update the reserve counters. Sample m_fdblocks
> >and
> >+ * perform a partial reservation if the request exceeds free space.
> >+ */
> >+ error = -ENOSPC;
> >+ while (error == -ENOSPC) {
>
> Why don't you make this a "do { } while (error == -ENOSPC)"? xfs_mod_fdblocks() will already set the error at the end of that loop.
>
Sure, I can clean that up. Thanks.
Brian
> Paulo
>
> --
> Paulo Alcantara, HP
> Speaking for myself only.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 12:58 [PATCH] xfs: refactor xfs_reserve_blocks() to handle ENOSPC correctly Brian Foster
2016-06-14 13:32 ` Paulo Alcantara
2016-06-14 13:37 ` Brian Foster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160614133721.GD32443@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=pcacjr@zytor.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox