From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EE87CEE for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 06:52:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36D230404E for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9Y0LXDzysA1v9YGG (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 04:52:04 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 008/119] xfs: separate freelist fixing into a separate helper Message-ID: <20160617115204.GG19042@infradead.org> References: <146612627129.12839.3827886950949809165.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146612632363.12839.15504324533944246285.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146612632363.12839.15504324533944246285.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com > +/* Ensure that the freelist is at full capacity. */ > +int > +xfs_free_extent_fix_freelist( > + struct xfs_trans *tp, > + xfs_agnumber_t agno, > + struct xfs_buf **agbp) > { > - xfs_alloc_arg_t args; > - int error; > + xfs_alloc_arg_t args; Use struct xfs_alloc_arg if you change this anyway. > + int error; > > - ASSERT(len != 0); > memset(&args, 0, sizeof(xfs_alloc_arg_t)); Same here. > - if (args.agbno + len > > - be32_to_cpu(XFS_BUF_TO_AGF(args.agbp)->agf_length)) { > - error = -EFSCORRUPTED; > - goto error0; > - } > + XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO(mp, > + agbno + len <= be32_to_cpu(XFS_BUF_TO_AGF(agbp)->agf_length), > + err); This introduces an overly long line. But except for these nitpicks this looks fine: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs