From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A1A7CEE for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 07:01:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306FBAC002 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id otNConbVD6cQeX22 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2016 05:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:01:44 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] fs: introduce iomap infrastructure Message-ID: <20160617120144.GA333@lst.de> References: <1464792297-13185-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1464792297-13185-3-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20160616161242.GB2106@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160616161242.GB2106@quack2.suse.cz> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jan Kara Cc: rpeterso@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:12:42PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > This is actually in 512-byte units, not in fs blocks as the comment > suggests, right? Indeed, thanks for spotting this! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs