From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C3F7CA1 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 07:59:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3DE8F8037 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 05:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id jCghfKBC5FCF7hB9 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 05:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 05:59:30 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] libxfs/linux.c: Replace use of ustat by stat Message-ID: <20160622125930.GA11203@infradead.org> References: <20160112195945.GC568@nyan> <20160113075501.GC21939@infradead.org> <20160113174241.GC10942@nyan> <20160114102009.GD27644@infradead.org> <20160618145349.GA17760@nyan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160618145349.GA17760@nyan> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com Sorr for not getting back to you. It turns out that simply using O_EXCL is fairly easy, but fitting it into a portabilitity framework isn't. So I think I'll have to give up on that attempt for now. That being said I think ustat fits pretty well for this use case, so getting rid of it might need a little more justification. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs