From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE607CA0 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 23:44:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB03CAC002 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 21:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id OAQJE9kuWnir69a4 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 21:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 12:44:10 +0800 From: Eryu Guan Subject: Re: Some xfstests failures on non-crc xfs with latest xfsprogs (v4.5.0-rc1) Message-ID: <20160625044410.GD23649@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> References: <20160304112354.GX11419@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> <727b405b-7df2-641a-d4d0-24333e003374@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <727b405b-7df2-641a-d4d0-24333e003374@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 05:37:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/4/16 5:23 AM, Eryu Guan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I noticed some xfstests failures while testing v4 XFS with latest > > v4.5.0-rc1 xfsprogs on v4.5-rc6 kernel, and all these failures are gone > > if I use v3.2.4 xfsprogs, or if test on v5 XFS. > > > > So either xfstests needs update or xfsprogs breaks something for non-crc > > XFS. But I'm not sure which is which, so I post them out for broader > > review. > > > > (All tests are checked with 'MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0" ./check ') > > Eryu, sorry you didn't get a reply on this in March. We should have > listened! ;) The patches I sent in the pat day or two should Thanks for looking at them! :) > fix some of these ... > > > == 1. xfs/032 fsck failure (xfs_db check) on ppc64 host == > > but not this one. Do you still see this? My recent test with 4.7-rc4 kernel and latest xfsprogs (June 22nd) shows xfs/032 passed on ppc64 host. But I'll retest to be sure. > > > == 2. xfs/033 fsck failure == > > > > xfs_repair detects more nlinks error. And this happens after commit > > "c2c5096 libxfs: update to 3.16 kernel code" > > this should be fixed by > [PATCH] xfs_repair: set rsumino version to 2 > > > == 3. xfs/108 xfs/196 xfs/261 xfs/244 fsck failure. == > > this should be fixed by > [PATCH] xfs_repair: don't call xfs_sb_quota_from_disk twice > > although I'm not sure about the ppc-specific failure. My recent test on RHEL7 shows xfs/244 is not ppc-specific. I'll retest with latest kernel and xfsprogs on ppc64 and report back. > > > These tests fail in a similiar way, and they are all quota related. > > Note that xfs/244 only fails on ppc64, others fail on all arches. > > > == 4. xfs/186 xfs/187 attr test failure == > > > > xfs/186 is missing almost all the attr values. > > [PATCH] xfs/186: fix test for crc=0, ftype=1 Thanks! I've queued it in fstests next pull request. Thanks, Eryu > > > xfs/187 reports test needs update. > > Not sure on this one yet. > > -Eric > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs