public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Some xfstests failures on non-crc xfs with latest xfsprogs (v4.5.0-rc1)
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 17:09:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160625090908.GE23649@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DFDE1D5E-8FC3-424F-B9B2-3701EA5A339A@sandeen.net>

On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:21:26AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
> > On Jun 24, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 05:37:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> On 3/4/16 5:23 AM, Eryu Guan wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> I noticed some xfstests failures while testing v4 XFS with latest
> >>> v4.5.0-rc1 xfsprogs on v4.5-rc6 kernel, and all these failures are gone
> >>> if I use v3.2.4 xfsprogs, or if test on v5 XFS.
> >>> 
> >>> So either xfstests needs update or xfsprogs breaks something for non-crc
> >>> XFS. But I'm not sure which is which, so I post them out for broader
> >>> review.
> >>> 
> >>> (All tests are checked with 'MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0" ./check <sometest>')
> >> 
> >> Eryu, sorry you didn't get a reply on this in March.  We should have
> >> listened!  ;)  The patches I sent in the pat day or two should
> > 
> > Thanks for looking at them! :)
> > 
> >> fix some of these ...
> >> 
> >>> == 1. xfs/032 fsck failure (xfs_db check) on ppc64 host ==
> >> 
> >> but not this one.  Do you still see this?
> > 
> > My recent test with 4.7-rc4 kernel and latest xfsprogs (June 22nd) shows
> > xfs/032 passed on ppc64 host. But I'll retest to be sure.
> 
> I wasn't thinking.  Brian's recent sparse inode patches fix this one.

Confirmed xfsprogs v4.7-rc1 passed the test.

And xfs/244 is not ppc-specific, x86_64 fails it either. I think your
patch could fix it as well.

Thanks,
Eryu

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2016-06-25  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-04 11:23 Some xfstests failures on non-crc xfs with latest xfsprogs (v4.5.0-rc1) Eryu Guan
2016-06-24 22:37 ` Eric Sandeen
2016-06-25  4:44   ` Eryu Guan
2016-06-25  5:21     ` Eric Sandeen
2016-06-25  9:09       ` Eryu Guan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160625090908.GE23649@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox