From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
To: Steve Brooks <sjb14@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Advice needed with file system corruption
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 15:05:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160714130546.GB16096@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5787852A.7030900@st-andrews.ac.uk>
Hi steve.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 01:27:22PM +0100, Steve Brooks wrote:
>
> The "3.1.1" version of "xfs_repair -n" ran in 1 minute, 32 seconds
>
> The "4.3" version of "xfs_repair -n" ran in 50 seconds
>
Yes, the later versions are compatible with old disk-format filesystems,
and they have improvements in memory usage, speed, etc too
>
> So my questions are
>
> [1] Which version of "xfs_repair" should I use to make the repair?
>
> [2] Is there anything I should have done differently?
>
No, just use the latest stable one, and the defaults, unless you have a good
reason to not use default options, which by your e-mail I believe you don't have
one.
The logs you send below, looks from a corrupted btree, but xfs_repair should be
able to fix that for you.
Cheers.
>
> Many thanks for any advice given it is much appreciated.
>
> Thanks, Steve
>
>
>
> Many blocks (about 20) of code similar to this were repeated in the logs.
>
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: ffff880dca95b000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: XFS (sde): Internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2)
> at line 2136 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xffffffffa0e6e81a
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel:
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: Pid: 8844, comm: idl Tainted: P --
> ------------ 2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64 #1
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: Call Trace:
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e7b68f>] ?
> xfs_error_report+0x3f/0x50 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e6e81a>] ?
> xfs_da_read_buf+0x2a/0x30 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e7b6fe>] ?
> xfs_corruption_error+0x5e/0x90 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e6e6fc>] ?
> xfs_da_do_buf+0x6cc/0x770 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e6e81a>] ?
> xfs_da_read_buf+0x2a/0x30 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff810154e3>] ?
> native_sched_clock+0x13/0x80
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e6e81a>] ?
> xfs_da_read_buf+0x2a/0x30 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e74a21>] ?
> xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int+0x61/0x2c0 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e74a21>] ?
> xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup_int+0x61/0x2c0 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e74e05>] ?
> xfs_dir2_leaf_lookup+0x35/0xf0 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e71306>] ?
> xfs_dir2_isleaf+0x26/0x60 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e71ce4>] ?
> xfs_dir_lookup+0x174/0x190 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e9ea47>] ? xfs_lookup+0x87/0x110
> [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0eabd74>] ?
> xfs_vn_lookup+0x54/0xa0 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff811a9ca5>] ? do_lookup+0x1a5/0x230
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff811aa823>] ?
> __link_path_walk+0x763/0x1060
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff811ab3da>] ? path_walk+0x6a/0xe0
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff811ab5eb>] ?
> filename_lookup+0x6b/0xc0
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff8123ac46>] ?
> security_file_alloc+0x16/0x20
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff811acac4>] ?
> do_filp_open+0x104/0xd20
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffffa0e9a4fc>] ?
> _xfs_trans_commit+0x25c/0x310 [xfs]
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff812a749a>] ?
> strncpy_from_user+0x4a/0x90
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff811ba252>] ? alloc_fd+0x92/0x160
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff81196bd7>] ?
> do_sys_open+0x67/0x130
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff81196ce0>] ? sys_open+0x20/0x30
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: [<ffffffff8100b0d2>] ?
> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: XFS (sde): Corruption detected. Unmount and
> run xfs_repair
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: ffff880dca95b000: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: XFS (sde): Internal error xfs_da_do_buf(2)
> at line 2136 of file fs/xfs/xfs_da_btree.c. Caller 0xffffffffa0e6e81a
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel:
> Jul 8 18:40:17 sraid1v kernel: Pid: 8844, comm: idl Tainted: P --
> ------------ 2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64 #1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Carlos
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-14 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-14 12:27 Advice needed with file system corruption Steve Brooks
2016-07-14 13:05 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]
2016-07-14 13:57 ` Steve Brooks
2016-07-14 14:17 ` Carlos Maiolino
2016-07-14 23:33 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-08 14:11 ` Emmanuel Florac
2016-08-08 15:38 ` Roger Willcocks
2016-08-08 15:44 ` Emmanuel Florac
2016-08-09 4:02 ` Gim Leong Chin
2016-08-09 12:40 ` Carlos E. R.
2016-08-09 15:43 ` Gim Leong Chin
2016-08-09 21:26 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-08 16:16 ` Steve Brooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160714130546.GB16096@redhat.com \
--to=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
--cc=sjb14@st-andrews.ac.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox