From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE05E7CC7 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:25:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74724AC001 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 1sbrUKUAhbVSSICe (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:25:46 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] xfs/310: fix the size calculation for the huge device Message-ID: <20160801062546.GE596@infradead.org> References: <146914477514.11762.3144320628851923350.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146914479586.11762.2725828627113169692.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146914479586.11762.2725828627113169692.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, eguan@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:46:35PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Fix the calculation of the dmhuge size. The previous calculation > tried to calculate the size correctly, but got it wrong for 1k > block sizes. Therefore, clean the whole mess up. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Looks fine, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs