From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA0B7CCA for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 01:27:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FE4304039 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LM6zxFZ3rrMdiU33 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:27:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:27:19 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test Message-ID: <20160801062719.GH596@infradead.org> References: <146914477514.11762.3144320628851923350.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <146914481474.11762.2741429828012981240.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <146914481474.11762.2741429828012981240.stgit@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, eguan@redhat.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Run xfs_repair twice at the end of each test -- once to rebuild > the btree indices, and again with -n to check the rebuild work. This looks fine to me in general, but shouldn't we have specific tests that test the rebuilding in a normal auto run? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs