From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE1B7CA3 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:36:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7548F8033 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id G2yV74bjPbGbpp9p (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:36:11 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH xfsprogs 01/14] configure: use AC_SYS_LARGEFILE Message-ID: <20160809073611.GC25647@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Good plan: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Does this also error out for libraries that don't support large off_t at all? I think that would be helpful to add if not there yet. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs