From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E347CA3 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:40:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B788F8035 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WSOQA0YT3ZQwiWFM (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:40:10 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH xfsprogs 11/14] replace statvfs64 by equivalent statvfs Message-ID: <20160809074010.GM25647@infradead.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:24:40AM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > For this it was necessary to change a workaround for missing > f_brsize on Mac OS X. If we can get rid of that it'd be fine, but can you explain a bit more why we can get rid of it? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs