From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB27F7CA4 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:41:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FABEAC002 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uUxaKVV03DMorMx5 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 00:41:38 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH xfsprogs 13/14] xfs.h: require transparent LFS Message-ID: <20160809074138.GO25647@infradead.org> References: <3be2b10b0037406374a415fda2318cbf95a67546.1470555003.git.felix.janda@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3be2b10b0037406374a415fda2318cbf95a67546.1470555003.git.felix.janda@posteo.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com > +extern int xfs_assert_largefile[sizeof(off_t)-8]; Please add a comment on why we have this declaration, otherwise this looks fine to me: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs