From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2467CA6 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:33:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B172F8F8037 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 01:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 4Xsu8lWjG0UrsQHJ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 01:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 01:33:32 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill __uint*_t and __int*_t Message-ID: <20160809083332.GA1489@infradead.org> References: <20160807173835.GA20839@nyan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160807173835.GA20839@nyan> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 07:38:35PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > Replace them by the more widely used uint*_t and int*_t. > > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda > --- > This patch is essentially a global > 'sed -i "s/__\(u*\)int\([0-9]*\)_t/\1int\2_t/"'. The only other changes > are whitespace changes and removing the now unecessary type definitions. > > Running 'sed "s/^.//"' on the patch might be useful for checking that > I didn't mess up the indentation. If everyone is fine using (u)int*_t over s*/u* this looks good. I'd have a slight preference for s*/u* as in the rest of the kernel, but either way getting rid of our crazy __ types is a good thing. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs