From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560607CA1 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:57:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17229304043 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:57:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rR3Rm6L4VAxmQfVj (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:57:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:57:53 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH xfsprogs 01/14] configure: use AC_SYS_LARGEFILE Message-ID: <20160812025753.GD10701@infradead.org> References: <20160809073611.GC25647@infradead.org> <20160809174105.GA5907@nyan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160809174105.GA5907@nyan> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 07:41:05PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > Thanks for reviewing the patch series! > > > Does this also error out for libraries that don't support large > > off_t at all? I think that would be helpful to add if not there yet. > > I do not quite understand. Do you refer to libraries using libxfs or > the external libraries used by xfsprogs? I meant C libraries, sorry. E.g. uclibc used to not support LFS many years ago, although they probably fixed it up by now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs