From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AA17CA0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:38:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABC58F8033 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id eo9MTP0Ej9qBgqwJ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:38:04 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 xfsprogs 03/14] remove unecessary definitions of _FILE_OFFSET_BITS Message-ID: <20160818173804.GC27799@infradead.org> References: <3dc24ff681ee0f831f2902bdb800547f0b63a30e.1471107858.git.felix.janda@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3dc24ff681ee0f831f2902bdb800547f0b63a30e.1471107858.git.felix.janda@posteo.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 07:28:16AM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > now that we use AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, there is no need to explicitly > define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs