From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348817CA1 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 12:47:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71F8AC002 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id GuKG8WCWPDKuh3fR (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:47:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1baRPq-00048h-2m for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 17:47:42 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 10:47:42 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: RFC: dropping IRIX support in xfsprogs Message-ID: <20160818174742.GA14464@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi all, I'd like to know if anyone would complain about removing IRIX support in xfsprogs? It very much looks unmaintained for years, and due to the IRIX differences in type defintions and kernel interfaces it's actually a bit of a drag on xfsprogs, so unlike the other ports to FreeBSD and Darwin it would actually be really helpful to remove it. I'd volunteer to prepare patches to remove the IRIX support and do the resulting cleanups. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs