From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA1D7CA0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:56:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FA68F8035 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Exjo0MSH3v8TZpYs (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:56:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 14:56:42 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RFC: dropping IRIX support in xfsprogs Message-ID: <20160818215642.GA17607@infradead.org> References: <20160818174742.GA14464@infradead.org> <20160818205914.GI19025@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160818205914.GI19025@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 06:59:14AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > We dropped support for older irix only filesystems some time ago, > so this seems like a natural progression from that. I have no > objections to removing it... Ok, I'll start sending patches once you're ok (or not ok) with the patches from Felix to turn on LFS support to avoid conflicting with those. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs