From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613997CA0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:07:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E461FAC004 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id E3pnp8V4E3PgScfV (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 19:07:39 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RFC: dropping IRIX support in xfsprogs Message-ID: <20160819020739.GA595@infradead.org> References: <20160818174742.GA14464@infradead.org> <20160818205914.GI19025@dastard> <20160818215642.GA17607@infradead.org> <20160818224332.GJ19025@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160818224332.GJ19025@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:43:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > I don't have any objections to them - I've jus tbeen busy with other > stuff and haven't merged them yet. You may as well just build on top > of them for the moment. I also don't want to force Darrick to have > to constantly rebase his userspace patchset, so I'm trying to get > all the rmap support merged before taking anything else into > xfsprogs... At least the patches from Felix shouldn't conflict at all with the rmap work. I'll just wait until both the rmap work and the largefile bits are merged and will prepare the IRIX removal after that. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs