From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10017CA2 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:23:46 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B358F8037 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id LZF1JZroRMd9WHy1 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:23:38 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: IRQ Lock Inversion dependency detected? Message-ID: <20160820232338.GL19025@dastard> References: <6b41c73b-9894-3076-670a-18c7247752b8@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6b41c73b-9894-3076-670a-18c7247752b8@shaw.ca> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Andrew Ryder Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:09:24AM -0400, Andrew Ryder wrote: > Had this pop up sometime in the last 24 hours but it didn't seem to > cause me any problems? Thought I'd pass it along if its of use or > ignore them in the future? I've attached the full dmesg output also. False positive. See commit dbad7c9 ("xfs: stop holding ILOCK over filldir callbacks") for explanation and the change that was made to stop lockdep triggering on this. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs