From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95FD7CA0 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:51:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785D6304039 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RkCQTsXIas3sdNd6 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:51:01 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 xfsprogs 00/14] Convert from off64_t to off_t Message-ID: <20160822115101.GV19025@dastard> References: <20160822030953.GS19025@dastard> <20160822070601.GA1205@nyan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160822070601.GA1205@nyan> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Janda Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:06:01AM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 07:04:18PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > > > This patch series does several things related to large file support. > > > > > > Patches 1-3 enable transparent LFS in the build system and make it > > > mandatory. > > > > > > Patches 4-9 and 12 replace *64 function and structure aliases. > > > > > > Patches 10 and 11 disable fsr on Mac OS X and do cleanup to enable > > > Patch 12. Further cleanup of the portability code is possible later. > > > > > > Patch 13 makes tranparent LFS also mandatory for all users of libxfs. > > > > > > Patch 14 finally replaces off64_t by off_t. > > > > Felix, can you check how you are sending these patches? The last two > > sets of patches you've sent have not threaded in the correct order > > (they thread in a random order) which means I have to manually > > reorder the patch set to get it to apply in the correct order via > > git am.... > > I am sorry for that. Should I resend the patch series? No, I've re-ordered it appropriately. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs