From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3580F7CA1 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:48:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40FB8F8033 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7enCOXsbl15Y5BKZ (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:48:44 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269 Message-ID: <20160826074844.GA17137@infradead.org> References: <20160826062508.GG19025@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160826062508.GG19025@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi Dave, please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for extent based filesystems" for 4.8. It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs