linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: rewrite and optimize the delalloc write path
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:07:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160826160753.GD17728@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160826160339.GC17728@bfoster.bfoster>

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:03:39PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
...
> > (we could potentially re-derive offset_fsb from offset if we don't
> > mind the inefficieny and recalculate maxbytes_fsb.  This already
> > assumes mp is trivially derived from ip)
> > 
> > and return
> > 
> > alloc_blocks, end_fsb
> > 
> > so the function would be quite a monster in terms of its calling
> > convention.  Additionally we'd have the related by not qute the
> > same if blocks around XFS_MOUNT_DFLT_IOSIZE and the isize split
> > over two functions, which doesn't exactly help understanding
> > the flow.
> > 
> 
> Not quite sure I follow the last bit, but I don't necessarily think the
> whole thing has to be boxed into a helper to clean it up. E.g., I'd do
> something like the appended diff (compile tested only).
> 

... and if the function signature is really an issue, trade off idx &
prev for a conditional base preallocation size (applies on top of the
previous diff):

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index 45e5268..c748429 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ STATIC xfs_fsblock_t
 xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
 	xfs_off_t		offset,
-	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	*prev)
+	xfs_extlen_t		base)
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
 	int			shift = 0;
@@ -406,8 +406,8 @@ xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(
 	 * always extends to MAXEXTLEN rather than falling short due to things
 	 * like stripe unit/width alignment of real extents.
 	 */
-	if (prev->br_blockcount <= (MAXEXTLEN >> 1))
-		alloc_blocks = prev->br_blockcount << 1;
+	if (base <= (MAXEXTLEN >> 1))
+		alloc_blocks = base << 1;
 	else
 		alloc_blocks = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, offset);
 	if (!alloc_blocks)
@@ -506,12 +506,10 @@ xfs_iomap_prealloc(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
 	loff_t			offset,
 	loff_t			count,
-	xfs_extnum_t		idx,
-	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	*prev)
+	xfs_extlen_t		base)
 {
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp = ip->i_mount;
 	xfs_fsblock_t		alloc_blocks;
-	xfs_fileoff_t		offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
 
 	if (offset + count <= XFS_ISIZE(ip))
 		return 0;
@@ -526,12 +524,11 @@ xfs_iomap_prealloc(
 	 */
 	if ((mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_DFLT_IOSIZE) ||
 	    XFS_ISIZE(ip) < XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_dalign) ||
-	    idx == 0 ||
-	    prev->br_startoff + prev->br_blockcount < offset_fsb)
+	    !base)
 		alloc_blocks = mp->m_writeio_blocks;
 	else
 		alloc_blocks =
-			xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(ip, offset, prev);
+			xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(ip, offset, base);
 
 	return alloc_blocks;
 }
@@ -603,8 +600,15 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay(
 	end_fsb = orig_end_fsb =
 		min(XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, offset + count), maxbytes_fsb);
 
-	if (eof)
-		prealloc = xfs_iomap_prealloc(ip, offset, count, idx, &prev);
+	if (eof) {
+		xfs_extlen_t	base = 0;
+
+		/* use prev extent as base if contiguous */
+		if (idx > 0 &&
+		    prev.br_startoff + prev.br_blockcount < offset_fsb)
+			base = prev.br_blockcount;
+		prealloc = xfs_iomap_prealloc(ip, offset, count, base);
+	}
 	if (prealloc) {
 		xfs_off_t	aligned_offset;
 		xfs_extlen_t	align;

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-26 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-21 21:51 iomap write fixes Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: move xfs_bmbt_to_iomap up Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 12:38   ` Brian Foster
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: factor our a helper to calculate the EOF alignment Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 12:38   ` Brian Foster
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: make xfs_inode_set_eofblocks_tag cheaper for the common case Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 12:38   ` Brian Foster
2016-08-26 14:26     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-26 16:02       ` Brian Foster
2016-08-30 14:40         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-30 23:03           ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: rewrite and optimize the delalloc write path Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 14:37   ` Brian Foster
2016-08-26 14:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-26 16:03       ` Brian Foster
2016-08-26 16:07         ` Brian Foster [this message]
2016-08-30 14:44           ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-30 20:28           ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160826160753.GD17728@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).