[ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

[ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

[Dave Chinner]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1586 bytes --]

Hi folks,

The for-next branch of the xfs kernel repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

has just been updated.

This (hopefully) is the last set of fixes for the 4.8 cycle - I plan
to send them to linus by the middle of next week. For this point
onwards I'll be focussing on patches for the 4.9 merge window - I'm
not sure how much of the reflink set we'll get through before the
window closes, but I'm going to take a good swing at getting that
merged for 4.9....

-Dave.

The new head of the for-next branch is commit:

800b269 xfs: prevent dropping ioend completions during buftarg wait

New Commits:

Brian Foster (1):
      [800b269] xfs: prevent dropping ioend completions during buftarg wait

Darrick J. Wong (5):
      [ed150e1] xfs: don't perform lookups on zero-height btrees
      [738f57c] xfs: disallow mounting of realtime + rmap filesystems
      [da1f039] xfs: don't log the entire end of the AGF
      [7222789] xfs: fix some key handling problems in _btree_simple_query_range
      [5b5c2db] xfs: simple btree query range should look right if LE lookup fails

Dave Chinner (1):
      [f3d7ebd] xfs: fix superblock inprogress check


Code Diffstat:

 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c  |  2 ++
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c  | 14 +++++++++++++-
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h |  6 ++++--
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_sb.c     |  3 ++-
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c           |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_super.c         |  9 ++++++++-
 6 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

[Christoph Hellwig]

Hi Dave,

please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for
extent based filesystems"

for 4.8.  It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap
implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

[Dave Chinner]

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:48:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for
> extent based filesystems"
> 
> for 4.8.  It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap
> implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well.

Oh, damn, I thought I got that one. I'll append it to the
series and push it out.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:31:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:48:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for
> > extent based filesystems"
> > 
> > for 4.8.  It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap
> > implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well.
> 
> Oh, damn, I thought I got that one. I'll append it to the
> series and push it out.

It might be a good idea to pick up "xfs: track log done items directly
in the deferred pending work item" too, if it fixes the slab
corruptions that Christoph reported.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

[Dave Chinner]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:52:49AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:31:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:48:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > > 
> > > please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for
> > > extent based filesystems"
> > > 
> > > for 4.8.  It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap
> > > implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well.
> > 
> > Oh, damn, I thought I got that one. I'll append it to the
> > series and push it out.
> 
> It might be a good idea to pick up "xfs: track log done items directly
> in the deferred pending work item" too, if it fixes the slab
> corruptions that Christoph reported.

Doesn't apply cleanly to the 4.8 tree, and the xfs_defer_finish()
code is quite different, so you'll need to rebase and resend that
patch if you think it needs to be applied to the 4.8-rc kernel.
I can always send it to Linus later.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269

[Darrick J. Wong]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:23:08AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:52:49AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:31:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:48:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > Hi Dave,
> > > > 
> > > > please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for
> > > > extent based filesystems"
> > > > 
> > > > for 4.8.  It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap
> > > > implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well.
> > > 
> > > Oh, damn, I thought I got that one. I'll append it to the
> > > series and push it out.
> > 
> > It might be a good idea to pick up "xfs: track log done items directly
> > in the deferred pending work item" too, if it fixes the slab
> > corruptions that Christoph reported.
> 
> Doesn't apply cleanly to the 4.8 tree, and the xfs_defer_finish()
> code is quite different, so you'll need to rebase and resend that
> patch if you think it needs to be applied to the 4.8-rc kernel.
> I can always send it to Linus later.

Heh, I forgot to shove it to the head of the queue before mailing it.
Will resend with that fixed.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs