From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA6F7CA0 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:23:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B178F804C for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id kxeKE2qRzt42ffE4 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 16:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:23:08 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfs: for-next branch updated to 800b269 Message-ID: <20160829232308.GQ19025@dastard> References: <20160826062508.GG19025@dastard> <20160826074844.GA17137@infradead.org> <20160829013111.GN19025@dastard> <20160829145249.GF22760@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160829145249.GF22760@birch.djwong.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:52:49AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:31:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:48:44AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > please consider: "[PATCH] iomap: don't set FIEMAP_EXTENT_MERGED for > > > extent based filesystems" > > > > > > for 4.8. It fixes a regression in the iomap-based fiemap > > > implementation, and it's fairly trivial as well. > > > > Oh, damn, I thought I got that one. I'll append it to the > > series and push it out. > > It might be a good idea to pick up "xfs: track log done items directly > in the deferred pending work item" too, if it fixes the slab > corruptions that Christoph reported. Doesn't apply cleanly to the 4.8 tree, and the xfs_defer_finish() code is quite different, so you'll need to rebase and resend that patch if you think it needs to be applied to the 4.8-rc kernel. I can always send it to Linus later. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs