From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xfs: rewrite and optimize the delalloc write path
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 16:28:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160830202820.GA16503@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160826160753.GD17728@bfoster.bfoster>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:07:53PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:03:39PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:37:09AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> ...
> > > (we could potentially re-derive offset_fsb from offset if we don't
> > > mind the inefficieny and recalculate maxbytes_fsb. This already
> > > assumes mp is trivially derived from ip)
> > >
> > > and return
> > >
> > > alloc_blocks, end_fsb
> > >
> > > so the function would be quite a monster in terms of its calling
> > > convention. Additionally we'd have the related by not qute the
> > > same if blocks around XFS_MOUNT_DFLT_IOSIZE and the isize split
> > > over two functions, which doesn't exactly help understanding
> > > the flow.
> > >
> >
> > Not quite sure I follow the last bit, but I don't necessarily think the
> > whole thing has to be boxed into a helper to clean it up. E.g., I'd do
> > something like the appended diff (compile tested only).
> >
>
> ... and if the function signature is really an issue, trade off idx &
> prev for a conditional base preallocation size (applies on top of the
> previous diff):
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index 45e5268..c748429 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ STATIC xfs_fsblock_t
> xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(
> struct xfs_inode *ip,
> xfs_off_t offset,
> - struct xfs_bmbt_irec *prev)
> + xfs_extlen_t base)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> int shift = 0;
> @@ -406,8 +406,8 @@ xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(
> * always extends to MAXEXTLEN rather than falling short due to things
> * like stripe unit/width alignment of real extents.
> */
> - if (prev->br_blockcount <= (MAXEXTLEN >> 1))
> - alloc_blocks = prev->br_blockcount << 1;
> + if (base <= (MAXEXTLEN >> 1))
> + alloc_blocks = base << 1;
> else
> alloc_blocks = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, offset);
> if (!alloc_blocks)
> @@ -506,12 +506,10 @@ xfs_iomap_prealloc(
> struct xfs_inode *ip,
> loff_t offset,
> loff_t count,
> - xfs_extnum_t idx,
> - struct xfs_bmbt_irec *prev)
> + xfs_extlen_t base)
> {
> struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
> xfs_fsblock_t alloc_blocks;
> - xfs_fileoff_t offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
>
> if (offset + count <= XFS_ISIZE(ip))
> return 0;
> @@ -526,12 +524,11 @@ xfs_iomap_prealloc(
> */
> if ((mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_DFLT_IOSIZE) ||
> XFS_ISIZE(ip) < XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_dalign) ||
> - idx == 0 ||
> - prev->br_startoff + prev->br_blockcount < offset_fsb)
> + !base)
> alloc_blocks = mp->m_writeio_blocks;
> else
> alloc_blocks =
> - xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(ip, offset, prev);
> + xfs_iomap_prealloc_size(ip, offset, base);
>
> return alloc_blocks;
> }
> @@ -603,8 +600,15 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay(
> end_fsb = orig_end_fsb =
> min(XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, offset + count), maxbytes_fsb);
>
> - if (eof)
> - prealloc = xfs_iomap_prealloc(ip, offset, count, idx, &prev);
> + if (eof) {
> + xfs_extlen_t base = 0;
> +
> + /* use prev extent as base if contiguous */
> + if (idx > 0 &&
> + prev.br_startoff + prev.br_blockcount < offset_fsb)
This should probably be: startoff + blockcount == offset_fsb
Brian
> + base = prev.br_blockcount;
> + prealloc = xfs_iomap_prealloc(ip, offset, count, base);
> + }
> if (prealloc) {
> xfs_off_t aligned_offset;
> xfs_extlen_t align;
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-30 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-21 21:51 iomap write fixes Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] xfs: move xfs_bmbt_to_iomap up Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 12:38 ` Brian Foster
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] xfs: factor our a helper to calculate the EOF alignment Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 12:38 ` Brian Foster
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] xfs: make xfs_inode_set_eofblocks_tag cheaper for the common case Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 12:38 ` Brian Foster
2016-08-26 14:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-26 16:02 ` Brian Foster
2016-08-30 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-30 23:03 ` Dave Chinner
2016-08-21 21:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] xfs: rewrite and optimize the delalloc write path Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-25 14:37 ` Brian Foster
2016-08-26 14:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-26 16:03 ` Brian Foster
2016-08-26 16:07 ` Brian Foster
2016-08-30 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-30 20:28 ` Brian Foster [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160830202820.GA16503@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).