From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: undo block reservation correctly in xfs_trans_reserve()
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:50:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160906115045.GG2462@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160906084828.GK30056@dastard>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 06:48:28PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:03:59PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > "blocks" should be added back to fdblocks at undo time, not taken
> > away, i.e. the minus sign should not be used.
>
> You've described the code change you made, not about the problem you
> hit and are fixing.
>
> i.e. I've got no idea how you found this, or even how to identify a
> system that is tripping over this problem. By describing how you
> found it and the symptoms being displayed, I'll learn from you how
> to identify the problem and hence, in future, be able to identify
> systems that are tripping over the problem, too.
Usually I will describe the symptoms, how I hit the problem and the
reproducer in commit log in details, but this time I found this bug by
code inspection, I don't have these information. I should have mentioned
this info too.
>
> > Fixes: 0d485ada404b ("xfs: use generic percpu counters for free block counter")
>
> I really don't like this sort of "annotation". It wrongly implies
> the commit was broken (it wasn't) and there's no scope for stating
> the problem context. i.e. that the problem is a minor regression in
> a rarely travelled corner case that is unlikely to affect production
> machines in any significant way. It's better to describe things with
> all the relevant context:
>
> "This is a regression introduced in commit ... and only occurs when
> .... "
Makes sense, will do so.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
>
> Not @redhat?
I thought that I'm employed by Red Hat as a QE not a filesystem
developer, all filesystem patches I send reflect my own opinions not my
employer's, so all silly mistakes I made in the patches are under my
personal email too :)
>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > index 5f3d33d..011dace 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ undo_log:
> >
> > undo_blocks:
> > if (blocks > 0) {
> > - xfs_mod_fdblocks(tp->t_mountp, -((int64_t)blocks), rsvd);
> > + xfs_mod_fdblocks(tp->t_mountp, ((int64_t)blocks), rsvd);
>
> Outer () can be dropped, too.
OK.
Thanks for the review!
Eryu
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-06 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-06 8:03 [PATCH] xfs: undo block reservation correctly in xfs_trans_reserve() Eryu Guan
2016-09-06 8:48 ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-06 11:50 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2016-09-06 22:35 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160906115045.GG2462@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).