linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: undo block reservation correctly in xfs_trans_reserve()
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:35:33 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160906223533.GL30056@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160906115045.GG2462@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 07:50:45PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 06:48:28PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:03:59PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > > Fixes: 0d485ada404b ("xfs: use generic percpu counters for free block counter")
> > 
> > I really don't like this sort of "annotation". It wrongly implies
> > the commit was broken (it wasn't) and there's no scope for stating
> > the problem context. i.e.  that the problem is a minor regression in
> > a rarely travelled corner case that is unlikely to affect production
> > machines in any significant way. It's better to describe things with
> > all the relevant context:
> > 
> > "This is a regression introduced in commit ... and only occurs when
> > .... "
> 
> Makes sense, will do so.
> 
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Not @redhat?
> 
> I thought that I'm employed by Red Hat as a QE not a filesystem
> developer, all filesystem patches I send reflect my own opinions not my
> employer's, so all silly mistakes I made in the patches are under my
> personal email too :)

Copyright assignments rarely work like that. It's a big grey area,
though, so I think you should check with your legal department as to
what you should use here.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2016-09-06 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-06  8:03 [PATCH] xfs: undo block reservation correctly in xfs_trans_reserve() Eryu Guan
2016-09-06  8:48 ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-06 11:50   ` Eryu Guan
2016-09-06 22:35     ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160906223533.GL30056@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).