From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591AC7CBD for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:13:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD1F8F8040 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id A1uADh29I5wkxEUG (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:12:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 09:12:56 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxcmd: fix counting of xfs entries in fs_table_insert Message-ID: <20160925161256.GA25791@infradead.org> References: <1474798162-25960-1-git-send-email-eguan@redhat.com> <20160925143155.GB29268@infradead.org> <20160925145816.GD27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160925145816.GD27776@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eryu Guan Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, billodo@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:58:16PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > It's already part of xfs/244, I noticed this bug because xfs/244 kept > running. I just put the minimum steps in commit log. So I think we're > good :) But only as part of xfs/244 which doesn't work for v5 file systems. To have good coverage we should not rely on testing an old format. That beeing said I can't see a good reason for why xfs/244 should not be run for v5 file systems, so I'll look into that instead. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs