From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4F17CA1 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:41:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48578F8035 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MRQQRQlIC5eL2qBA for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:41:29 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: Clarification required about xfs_metadump and xfs_mdrestore Message-ID: <20160927214129.GC27872@dastard> References: <20160927170443.GR9314@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: murali krishna Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, "Darrick J. Wong" On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 01:27:12PM -0400, murali krishna wrote: > Hi Darrick, > > Thanks for the response. > > Could you please clarify if there is any strong reason behind in stating to > use xfs_metadump and xfs_mdrestore as just debugging tools in their > respective man pages ? The man page is simply stating the truth - metadump/restore are debugging tools used by XFS developers for obtaining information required for forensic analysis of filesystem failures. What you are wanting to do will not work, is not supported, and you get to keep all the broken bits to yourself if you try it. Every XFS developer you ask will say the same thing: xfsdump/encrypt/mkfs/xfs_restore is the only way to do what you want to do. -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs