linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] ext2: remove support for DAX PMD faults
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:47:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160927214720.GD27872@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1475009282-9818-5-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> DAX PMD support was added via the following commit:
> 
> commit e7b1ea2ad658 ("ext2: huge page fault support")
> 
> I believe this path to be untested as ext2 doesn't reliably provide block
> allocations that are aligned to 2MiB.  In my testing I've been unable to
> get ext2 to actually fault in a PMD.  It always fails with a "pfn
> unaligned" message because the sector returned by ext2_get_block() isn't
> aligned.
> 
> I've tried various settings for the "stride" and "stripe_width" extended
> options to mkfs.ext2, without any luck.
> 
> Since we can't reliably get PMDs, remove support so that we don't have an
> untested code path that we may someday traverse when we happen to get an
> aligned block allocation.  This should also make 4k DAX faults in ext2 a
> bit faster since they will no longer have to call the PMD fault handler
> only to get a response of VM_FAULT_FALLBACK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
....
> @@ -154,7 +133,6 @@ static int ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  
>  static const struct vm_operations_struct ext2_dax_vm_ops = {
>  	.fault		= ext2_dax_fault,
> -	.pmd_fault	= ext2_dax_pmd_fault,
>  	.page_mkwrite	= ext2_dax_fault,
>  	.pfn_mkwrite	= ext2_dax_pfn_mkwrite,
>  };

Would it be better to put a comment mentioning this here? So as the
years go by, this reminds people not to bother trying to implement
it?

/*
 * .pmd_fault is not supported for DAX because allocation in ext2
 * cannot be reliably aligned to huge page sizes and so pmd faults
 * will always fail and fail back to regular faults.
 */

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-27 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-27 20:47 [PATCH v3 00/11] re-enable DAX PMD support Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] ext4: allow DAX writeback for hole punch Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] ext4: tell DAX the size of allocation holes Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] dax: remove buffer_size_valid() Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] ext2: remove support for DAX PMD faults Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 21:47   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-09-28 18:46     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] dax: make 'wait_table' global variable static Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] dax: consistent variable naming for DAX entries Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] dax: coordinate locking for offsets in PMD range Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:47 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] dax: remove dax_pmd_fault() Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] dax: add struct iomap based DAX PMD support Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 22:14   ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-29 18:20     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] xfs: use struct iomap based DAX PMD fault path Ross Zwisler
2016-09-27 20:48 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] dax: remove "depends on BROKEN" from FS_DAX_PMD Ross Zwisler
2016-09-28  2:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] re-enable DAX PMD support Christoph Hellwig
2016-09-28  4:55   ` Dave Chinner
2016-09-29 18:23     ` Ross Zwisler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160927214720.GD27872@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mawilcox@microsoft.com \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).