From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:50949 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbcI3I03 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:26:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 01:26:28 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 57/63] xfs: check for invalid inode reflink flags Message-ID: <20160930082628.GJ32335@infradead.org> References: <147520472904.29434.15518629624221621056.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <147520511076.29434.10817761072405321509.stgit@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <147520511076.29434.10817761072405321509.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:11:50PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > We don't support sharing blocks on the realtime device. Flag inodes > with the reflink or cowextsize flags set when the reflink feature is > disabled. Looks fine, but why didn't this go into the patches adding reflink support earlier? Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig