From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:51371 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752363AbcJCSBe (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 14:01:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:01:32 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: XFS reflink trees updated for 4.9 Message-ID: <20161003180132.GA6469@infradead.org> References: <20161002190106.GC21076@birch.djwong.org> <20161003172123.GD21076@birch.djwong.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161003172123.GD21076@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Brian Foster , amir73il@gmail.com On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 10:21:23AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 12:01:07PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Seeing as 4.8 is probably going out today, here's the latest for-4.9 branch: > > > > https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-9 > > https://github.com/djwong/xfsprogs/tree/for-dave-for-4.9-9 > > https://github.com/djwong/xfstests/tree/djwong-devel > > Rebased against yesterday's for-next: Just when I finished testing the previous iteration, which went all fine, btw.