linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: refactor xfs_bunmapi_cow
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:26:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013132647.GB9339@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013065432.GC10579@lst.de>

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 08:54:32AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:13:08AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Update the inode delalloc counter now and wait to update the
> > > +	 * sb counters as we might have to borrow some blocks for the
> > > +	 * indirect block accounting.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks(NULL, ip, -((long)del->br_blockcount), 0,
> > > +			isrt ? XFS_QMOPT_RES_RTBLKS : XFS_QMOPT_RES_REGBLKS);
> > > +	ip->i_delayed_blks -= del->br_blockcount;
> > > +
> > 
> > This appears to be fixed up later, but i_delayed_blks is accounted twice
> > as of this patch. It would be nice if we could avoid known breakage,
> > even if transient.
> 
> Where do we account for it the second time?
> 

Note again that this is transient and fixed up in a later patch (so you
won't see it looking at the code with the full series applied). But as
of this patch the following is possible:

  ...
  xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_blocks()
    i_delayed_blks -= blockcount
    xfs_bunmapi_cow()
      xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay()
        i_delayed_blks -= blockcount

Brian

> > > +	case 0:
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Deleting the middle of the extent.
> > > +		 *
> > > +		 * Distribute the original indlen reservation across the two
> > > +		 * new extents.  Steal blocks from the deleted extent if
> > > +		 * necessary. Stealing blocks simply fudges the fdblocks
> > > +		 * accounting in xfs_bunmapi().
> > > +		 */
> > > +		trace_xfs_bmap_pre_update(ip, *idx, state, _THIS_IP_);
> > > +		got->br_blockcount = del->br_startoff - got->br_startoff;
> > > +
> > > +		got_indlen = xfs_bmap_worst_indlen(ip, got->br_blockcount);
> > > +		new_indlen = xfs_bmap_worst_indlen(ip, new.br_blockcount);
> > 
> > Doesn't look like new.br_blockcount is set until a few lines below.
> 
> Indeed.  Fixed for the next resend.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-13 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-10 13:37 optimize the COW I/O path Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/9] iomap: add IOMAP_REPORT Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-11  1:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-10-11  4:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]     ` <20161011144557.GA16368@lst.de>
2016-10-11 16:22       ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-10-10 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: add xfs_trim_extent Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: handle "raw" delayed extents xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: don't bother looking at the refcount tree for reads Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: optimize writes to reflink files Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:12   ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13  6:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 13:26       ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13 18:28         ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: refactor xfs_bunmapi_cow Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:13   ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13  6:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 13:26       ` Brian Foster [this message]
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: optimize xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:13   ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13  7:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: optimize xfs_reflink_end_cow Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:15   ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13  7:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 13:27       ` Brian Foster
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove xfs_bunmapi_cow Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-15  8:52 optimize the COW I/O path V2 Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-15  8:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: refactor xfs_bunmapi_cow Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 17:21   ` Brian Foster
2016-10-17 17:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 17:53       ` Brian Foster
2016-10-17 18:32   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161013132647.GB9339@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).