From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] xfs: refactor xfs_bunmapi_cow
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 09:26:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161013132647.GB9339@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161013065432.GC10579@lst.de>
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 08:54:32AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:13:08AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Update the inode delalloc counter now and wait to update the
> > > + * sb counters as we might have to borrow some blocks for the
> > > + * indirect block accounting.
> > > + */
> > > + xfs_trans_reserve_quota_nblks(NULL, ip, -((long)del->br_blockcount), 0,
> > > + isrt ? XFS_QMOPT_RES_RTBLKS : XFS_QMOPT_RES_REGBLKS);
> > > + ip->i_delayed_blks -= del->br_blockcount;
> > > +
> >
> > This appears to be fixed up later, but i_delayed_blks is accounted twice
> > as of this patch. It would be nice if we could avoid known breakage,
> > even if transient.
>
> Where do we account for it the second time?
>
Note again that this is transient and fixed up in a later patch (so you
won't see it looking at the code with the full series applied). But as
of this patch the following is possible:
...
xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_blocks()
i_delayed_blks -= blockcount
xfs_bunmapi_cow()
xfs_bmap_del_extent_delay()
i_delayed_blks -= blockcount
Brian
> > > + case 0:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Deleting the middle of the extent.
> > > + *
> > > + * Distribute the original indlen reservation across the two
> > > + * new extents. Steal blocks from the deleted extent if
> > > + * necessary. Stealing blocks simply fudges the fdblocks
> > > + * accounting in xfs_bunmapi().
> > > + */
> > > + trace_xfs_bmap_pre_update(ip, *idx, state, _THIS_IP_);
> > > + got->br_blockcount = del->br_startoff - got->br_startoff;
> > > +
> > > + got_indlen = xfs_bmap_worst_indlen(ip, got->br_blockcount);
> > > + new_indlen = xfs_bmap_worst_indlen(ip, new.br_blockcount);
> >
> > Doesn't look like new.br_blockcount is set until a few lines below.
>
> Indeed. Fixed for the next resend.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-13 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 13:37 optimize the COW I/O path Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/9] iomap: add IOMAP_REPORT Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-11 1:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-10-11 4:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20161011144557.GA16368@lst.de>
2016-10-11 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-10-10 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: add xfs_trim_extent Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: handle "raw" delayed extents xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: don't bother looking at the refcount tree for reads Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: optimize writes to reflink files Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:12 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13 6:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 13:26 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13 18:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: refactor xfs_bunmapi_cow Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:13 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 13:26 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: optimize xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:13 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13 7:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: optimize xfs_reflink_end_cow Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-12 14:15 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-13 7:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-13 13:27 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-10 13:38 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: remove xfs_bunmapi_cow Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-15 8:52 optimize the COW I/O path V2 Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-15 8:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: refactor xfs_bunmapi_cow Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 17:21 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-17 17:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 17:53 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-17 18:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161013132647.GB9339@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).