From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.145]:56076 "EHLO
        ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752724AbcJSVt2 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 19 Oct 2016 17:49:28 -0400
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:49:23 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: Xfs lockdep warning with for-dave-for-4.6 branch
Message-ID: <20161019214923.GI23194@dastard>
References: <20160516231056.GE18496@dastard>
 <20160517144912.GZ3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20160517223549.GV26977@dastard>
 <20160519081146.GS3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20160520001714.GC26977@dastard>
 <20160601131758.GO26601@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20160601181617.GV3190@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20161006130454.GI10570@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20161019083304.GD3102@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <20161019120626.GI7517@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161019120626.GI7517@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: xfs
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:06:27PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 19-10-16 10:33:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> [...]
> > So I'm all for this if this works for Dave.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Thanks Peter!
> 
> > Please take it through the XFS tree which would introduce its first user
> > etc..
> 
> Dave, does that work for you? I agree that having this followed by a
> first user would be really preferable. Maybe to turn some of those added
> by b17cb364dbbb? I wish I could help here but as you've said earlier
> each such annotation should be accompanied by an explanation which I am
> not qualified to provide.

I've got my hands full right now, so I'm not going to try to page
all this stuff back into my brain right now.  Try reminding me as
the merge window gets closer...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com