From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, michaelcallahan@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix the AG loop in xfs_alloc_vextent for busy extents
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:41:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161021144133.GA54851@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161021124824.GA17667@lst.de>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 02:48:24PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:48:08AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > > if (args->agbp) {
> > > - if ((error = xfs_alloc_ag_vextent(args)))
> > > + error = xfs_alloc_ag_vextent(args);
> > > + if (error)
> > > goto error0;
> > > - break;
> > > + if (args->agbno != NULLAGBLOCK)
> > > + break;
> > > + xfs_trans_brelse(args->tp, args->agbp);
> >
> > How is this safe with respect to xfs_alloc_fix_freelist() potentially
> > dirtying the agf? Haven't we had deadlock and/or other problems due to
> > xfs_alloc_fix_freelist() succeeding when an allocation ultimately fails,
> > and subsequently rotating to a potentially lower agno?
>
> We've had the case where the allocation would fail despite
> xfs_alloc_fix_freelist succeeding forever, it's just that with
> discard in general and async discard in particular we can hit it
> much more easily.
>
Perhaps, but I think that is beside the point. IME, any time that has
resulted in such a deadlock, we attribute it to the fact that
xfs_alloc_fix_freelist() succeeded in a case where it shouldn't have. I
don't think we should introduce more of such cases if we can help it.
> The only way to make the allocation no fail if xfs_alloc_fix_freelist
> succeeded would be to force out any busy extents at the low level
> if we are tigh on space, I'll have to see how doable that would be.
>
> The other option would be to roll around the transaction when switching
> to a different AG so that we can release the locks. That sounds a lot
> easier, and also less fragile in the long run.
That sounds reasonable provided we don't have any partial modifications
or whatnot in the transaction. Another angle might be to find a way to
take the busy extents into consideration before xfs_alloc_fix_freelist()
actually makes any changes, but I also don't know how straightforward
that might be either.
Brian
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-21 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-17 20:22 discard improvements Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: fix the AG loop in xfs_alloc_vextent for busy extents Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-19 13:48 ` Brian Foster
2016-10-21 12:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-21 14:41 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2016-11-08 6:15 ` Dave Chinner
2016-11-10 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: don't block the log commit handler for discards Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 23:29 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-18 5:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-19 10:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-28 16:16 ` Michael Callahan
2016-10-31 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-17 20:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: merge discard requests Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-28 10:11 ` discard improvements Avi Kivity
2016-10-31 15:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-05 18:18 ` Avi Kivity
2016-11-06 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-06 23:21 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161021144133.GA54851@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelcallahan@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).