From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:36428 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932758AbcJZSAY (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:00:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:59:56 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/39] xfs: introduce the CoW fork Message-ID: <20161026175956.GG26572@birch.djwong.org> References: <147743661772.11035.560864407573832590.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <147743666109.11035.5850104676966406279.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20161026102524.GF29648@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161026102524.GF29648@infradead.org> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: david@fromorbit.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 03:25:24AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:04:21PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Introduce a new in-core fork for storing copy-on-write delalloc > > reservations and allocated extents that are in the process of being > > written out. > > > > [Clean up the CoW fork, should there ever be one.] > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong > > What's up with all these odd commit message and tiny not really > standalone patches? Silly me just rammed the old patch stack into the new for-next base, with the result that the patches that still had un-merged hunks got left in the patch stack with commit messages intact. Dave yelled at me to fix the commit messages, so I changed the commit messages to be the text in the brackets before the S-o-B and pushed the mess to github. I figured I ought to wait a day or two for more reviews to come in before re-spamming everyone. Sorry about the spew. --D