linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] xfs: logically separate iomap range from allocation range
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 13:11:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161115181108.GD65218@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115141804.GB18630@infradead.org>

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 06:18:04AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:27:34PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > The xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay() function currently converts the bmbt
> > record output from the xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() call to the iomap
> > mapping for the higher level iomap code. In preparation to reuse
> > xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay() for data fork and COW fork allocation,
> > logically separate the iomap mapping provided to the caller from the
> > bmbt record returned by xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc().
> > 
> > This is necessary because while COW reservation involves delalloc
> > allocation to the COW fork, the mapping returned to the caller must
> > still refer to the shared blocks from the data fork. Note that this
> > patch does not change behavior in any way.
> 
> On it's own this patch looks highly confusing.  I'll keep reading
> the rest of the series if it makes more sense with that, but in doubt
> it probably should be merged into whatever patches it helps with.

Heh, Ok. I'll revisit this when the rest of the code is more fleshed
out.

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-15 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-08 20:27 [PATCH RFC 0/4] xfs: basic cow fork speculative preallocation Brian Foster
2016-11-08 20:27 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] xfs: clean up cow fork reservation and tag inodes correctly Brian Foster
2016-11-15 14:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-15 18:11     ` Brian Foster
2016-11-18  8:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 15:10         ` Brian Foster
2016-11-08 20:27 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] xfs: logically separate iomap range from allocation range Brian Foster
2016-11-15 14:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-15 18:11     ` Brian Foster [this message]
2016-11-08 20:27 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] xfs: reuse xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay() for cow fork delalloc Brian Foster
2016-11-15 14:28   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-15 18:11     ` Brian Foster
2016-11-18  8:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-11-18 15:11         ` Brian Foster
2016-11-08 20:27 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] xfs: implement basic COW fork speculative preallocation Brian Foster
2016-11-08 20:48 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] xfs: basic cow " Darrick J. Wong
2016-11-08 22:39   ` Brian Foster
2016-11-08 23:34     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161115181108.GD65218@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).