From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: use xfs_vn_setattr_size to check on new size
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 18:29:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161201102932.GD29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161201102635.GA23215@infradead.org>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 02:26:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:18:00PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > Commit 6552321831dc ("xfs: remove i_iolock and use i_rwsem in the
> > VFS inode instead") introduced a regression that truncate(2) doesn't
> > check on new size, so it succeeds even if the new size exceeds the
> > current resource limit. Because xfs_setattr_size() was used instead
> > of xfs_vn_setattr_size(), and the latter calls xfs_vn_change_ok()
> > first to do sanity check on permission and new size.
>
> Oops, looks like this was a merge error..
>
> >
> > This is found by truncate03 test from ltp, and the following is a
> > simplified reproducer:
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> > dev=/dev/sda5
> > mnt=/mnt/xfs
> >
> > mkfs -t xfs -f $dev
> > mount $dev $mnt
> >
> > # set max file size to 16k
> > ulimit -f 16
> > truncate -s $((16 * 1024 + 1)) /mnt/xfs/testfile
> > [ $? -eq 0 ] && echo "FAIL: truncate exceeded max file size"
> > ulimit -f unlimited
> > umount $mnt
>
> Can you add this to xfstests?
Sure, I'll work on it.
>
> The patch looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Thanks!
Eryu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-01 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-01 10:18 [PATCH] xfs: use xfs_vn_setattr_size to check on new size Eryu Guan
2016-12-01 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-01 10:29 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161201102932.GD29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).