From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48928 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751246AbcLJQXZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 11:23:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:23:24 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when selecting an AG Message-ID: <20161210162324.GB3204@lst.de> References: <1481303709-12632-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20161210061641.GQ29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161210061641.GQ29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com> Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: List-Id: xfs To: Eryu Guan Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 02:16:41PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote: > I hit "Internal error xfs_trans_cancel" and force shutdown while running > xfs/109 in a loop with xfs_2k_reflink test config, first hit at 62nd > iteration then hit at 32nd iteration. Detailed log appended at the end. That's the bmap btree insert, so we're still having a problem figuring out the right indlen somehow.