From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50296 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752089AbcLKFT6 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 11 Dec 2016 00:19:58 -0500
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 13:19:55 +0800
From: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfs: take indirect blocks into accounting when
 selecting an AG
Message-ID: <20161211051955.GR29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
References: <1481303709-12632-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de>
 <20161210061641.GQ29149@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
 <20161210164236.GA3542@lst.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161210164236.GA3542@lst.de>
Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: xfs
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, darrick.wong@oracle.com

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 05:42:36PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, is this on 4.9-rc or for-next?

It's for-next. Sorry, I should've included this info.

Thanks,
Eryu